← All comparisons

Spanlens vs Arize Phoenix · 2026

Built for the production app developer, not the ML engineer in a notebook. JS/TS gets equal billing with Python.

Summary

Phoenix has serious ML-observability DNA from Arize and is excellent if you're an ML engineer who lives in Python notebooks. Spanlens is built for the app developer who shipped an LLM feature last week, with proxy-first install, JS/TS equal-class with Python, statistical A/B testing, and a fully MIT-licensed codebase (Phoenix is source-available under ELv2).

At a glance: Spanlens vs Arize Phoenix (2026)

Side-by-side feature comparison of Spanlens and Arize Phoenix in 2026.
FeatureSpanlensArize Phoenix
Optimized for app developersYesPartial
Optimized for ML engineers / notebook usersPartialYes
JS/TS as first-class languageYesPartial
Python as first-class languageYesYes
1-line baseURL proxy swapYesNo
OpenInference / OTel SDK instrumentationPartialYes
TypeScript SDKYesPartial
Python SDKYesYes
Per-request log with full bodyYesYes
Cost trackingYesPartial
Agent tracing (waterfall)YesYes
Critical Path on agent tracesYesNo
3σ anomaly detection on latency/costYesPartial
Versioned prompt libraryYesPartial
Production A/B traffic splitYesNo
Built-in Welch t-test on A/BYesNo
LLM-as-judge scoringYesYes
Human annotation queueYesYes
Judge to human correlation trackingYesPartial
Datasets / golden test setsYesYes
Embedding projector / drift analysisNoYes
Model swap recommendations with $ savingsYesNo
Per-model cost breakdown & budget alertsYesPartial
Security scanning (API keys, PII, prompt injection)YesPartial
OSI-approved open-source licenseYesNo
Docker Compose self-hostYesYes
Managed cloud with a free tierYesYes

Updated 2026-06-03. Scroll for the grouped view with notes below.

Why teams pick Spanlens over Arize Phoenix

Built for the application developer

Phoenix comes from Arize, an ML-observability company. Its UX reflects that audience (eval studios, embedding projectors, drift charts). Spanlens is built for the dev who shipped an LLM feature to production last week and needs cost, latency, and quality answers fast.

JS/TS is first-class, not second

Phoenix is Python-first and JS support is lighter. Spanlens TypeScript SDK and proxy approach treat Next.js, Hono, Bun, and Cloudflare Workers as first-class citizens, the same surface as Python.

Proxy install, no instrumentation code

Phoenix uses OpenInference SDKs that wrap your client. You touch every call site. Spanlens is a baseURL swap. Existing apps with hundreds of LLM calls get instrumented in one config change.

MIT license, not source-available

Spanlens ships under MIT, an OSI-approved license you can use, modify, and even run as a service. Phoenix is Elastic License 2.0, which is source-available but restricts offering it as a managed service. Both now have a free hosted tier, so the real difference is what the license lets you do with the code.

Model savings recommender with dollar figures

Spanlens proactively flags routes where a smaller model would match quality. Phoenix has rich analysis but doesn't recommend cost-tier swaps.

Critical Path on agent traces

Spanlens highlights the longest dependency chain in agent traces automatically, the actual bottleneck. Phoenix renders waterfalls but doesn't compute critical path.

Feature-by-feature

Audience & ergonomics
Feature
Spanlens
Arize Phoenix
Optimized for app developers
Optimized for ML engineers / notebook users
JS/TS as first-class language
Python as first-class language
Setup
Feature
Spanlens
Arize Phoenix
1-line baseURL proxy swap
OpenInference / OTel SDK instrumentation
TypeScript SDK
Python SDK
Core observability
Feature
Spanlens
Arize Phoenix
Per-request log with full body
Cost tracking
Agent tracing (waterfall)
Critical Path on agent traces
3σ anomaly detection on latency/cost
Prompts & experiments
Feature
Spanlens
Arize Phoenix
Versioned prompt library
Production A/B traffic split
Built-in Welch t-test on A/B
Eval & quality
Feature
Spanlens
Arize Phoenix
LLM-as-judge scoring
Human annotation queue
Judge to human correlation tracking
Datasets / golden test sets
Embedding projector / drift analysis
Spanlens does not ship an embedding projector. If drift analysis on embeddings is part of your release gate, that's a Phoenix-side requirement.
Cost optimization
Feature
Spanlens
Arize Phoenix
Model swap recommendations with $ savings
Per-model cost breakdown & budget alerts
Security
Feature
Spanlens
Arize Phoenix
Security scanning (API keys, PII, prompt injection)
Spanlens runs detection on every request body at log time.
License & deployment
Feature
Spanlens
Arize Phoenix
OSI-approved open-source license
Spanlens is MIT. Phoenix is Elastic License 2.0 (source-available), not an OSI-approved open-source license.
Docker Compose self-host
Managed cloud with a free tier
Phoenix Cloud added a free tier and a $50/mo Pro plan; both products now offer transparent hosted pricing.

Last updated 2026-06-03 · Spot something inaccurate? Let us know.

When Arize Phoenix might be the better fit

We don't think every team should pick us. Here's where Arize Phoenix legitimately wins.

You're an ML engineer, not an app developer

If you work in notebooks, care about embedding drift, and want UMAP projections of your prompt space, Phoenix's ML-engineer DNA is exactly right. Spanlens optimizes for the production app developer instead.

You're committed to OpenInference / OTel standards

Phoenix is the reference implementation for the OpenInference spec. If your org has standardized on it, Phoenix is the natural choice. Spanlens supports OTLP ingest but Phoenix's OpenInference lineage is deeper.

You want notebook-driven exploration

Phoenix can be launched inside a notebook for ad-hoc trace exploration during development. Spanlens is a server you point your app at, a different ergonomic.

You'll outgrow into Arize Enterprise

If your team plans to graduate to Arize's full ML platform, starting on Phoenix means a smooth upgrade path. Spanlens is a destination, not a stepping-stone.

Frequently asked questions

Why pick Spanlens over Arize Phoenix for "Built for the application developer"?

Phoenix comes from Arize, an ML-observability company. Its UX reflects that audience (eval studios, embedding projectors, drift charts). Spanlens is built for the dev who shipped an LLM feature to production last week and needs cost, latency, and quality answers fast.

Why pick Spanlens over Arize Phoenix for "JS/TS is first-class, not second"?

Phoenix is Python-first and JS support is lighter. Spanlens TypeScript SDK and proxy approach treat Next.js, Hono, Bun, and Cloudflare Workers as first-class citizens, the same surface as Python.

Why pick Spanlens over Arize Phoenix for "Proxy install, no instrumentation code"?

Phoenix uses OpenInference SDKs that wrap your client. You touch every call site. Spanlens is a baseURL swap. Existing apps with hundreds of LLM calls get instrumented in one config change.

Why pick Spanlens over Arize Phoenix for "MIT license, not source-available"?

Spanlens ships under MIT, an OSI-approved license you can use, modify, and even run as a service. Phoenix is Elastic License 2.0, which is source-available but restricts offering it as a managed service. Both now have a free hosted tier, so the real difference is what the license lets you do with the code.

Why pick Spanlens over Arize Phoenix for "Model savings recommender with dollar figures"?

Spanlens proactively flags routes where a smaller model would match quality. Phoenix has rich analysis but doesn't recommend cost-tier swaps.

Why pick Spanlens over Arize Phoenix for "Critical Path on agent traces"?

Spanlens highlights the longest dependency chain in agent traces automatically, the actual bottleneck. Phoenix renders waterfalls but doesn't compute critical path.

When is Arize Phoenix a better fit than Spanlens for "You're an ML engineer, not an app developer"?

If you work in notebooks, care about embedding drift, and want UMAP projections of your prompt space, Phoenix's ML-engineer DNA is exactly right. Spanlens optimizes for the production app developer instead.

When is Arize Phoenix a better fit than Spanlens for "You're committed to OpenInference / OTel standards"?

Phoenix is the reference implementation for the OpenInference spec. If your org has standardized on it, Phoenix is the natural choice. Spanlens supports OTLP ingest but Phoenix's OpenInference lineage is deeper.

When is Arize Phoenix a better fit than Spanlens for "You want notebook-driven exploration"?

Phoenix can be launched inside a notebook for ad-hoc trace exploration during development. Spanlens is a server you point your app at, a different ergonomic.

When is Arize Phoenix a better fit than Spanlens for "You'll outgrow into Arize Enterprise"?

If your team plans to graduate to Arize's full ML platform, starting on Phoenix means a smooth upgrade path. Spanlens is a destination, not a stepping-stone.

If you're an ML engineer with a Python-first workflow, Phoenix fits your hands. If you're shipping LLM features in a Next.js, FastAPI, or Hono app and want zero-friction install, try Spanlens.

Free tier · No credit card · Self-host with Docker